Summary: Dialogue Day 9
- Archived: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:20:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:18:57 -0400
- From: Katherine Carlitz <kcarlitz+@pitt.edu>
- Subject: Summary: Dialogue Day 9
- X-topic: States/Tribes/Municipalities
Dialogue Day 9 Agenda: States, Tribes and Local Governments
Dialogue moderator Bob Carlitz and Host Mark Flory, from
the State and Local Government Team in EPA's Office of
Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations, welcomed
participants and introduced today's topic: States, Tribes
and Local Governments. Bob Carlitz pointed out that states,
Tribes and local governments are not only affected by EPA's
decisions; they are also co-regulators in the environmental
field. He invited comments on this dual role in the
following areas:
* States best practice
* Tribal government best practice
* Local government best practice
* Involvement in delegated programs
* Supporting local government's participation
Mark Flory's work ten years ago in the Region 9 San
Francisco office introduced him to the issues involved in
co-regulation, and the greatest challenges he faced at that
time were identifying and involving the "public" relevant
to a given issue, and then getting them involved and
keeping them from feeling overwhelmed by floods of data.
He invited comments on whether these are still problems for
those working with state and local
agencies today.
* Facilitator Laurie Maak announced that the Dialogue has
1145 people registered as participants and observers
worldwide, and supplied the URL for the map showing
geographical distribution in the US (with apologies to
Alaska and Hawaii, not yet included).
* Panelists introduced themselves and described their work
and their concerns. Hamilton Brown, from EPA's Small Town
Task Force, finds that small communities often feel they
are being made to follow requirements that were established
with the resources of major metropolitan areas in mind.
The indigenous communities that Patricia Cochran (Inupiat
herself) works with in Alaska have found their subsistence
food contaminated, and her organization works with EPA not
only to gather information about the contamination, but to
document indigenous perceptions of the problem. Mary
Hamel, from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,
has gathered information on which co-regulatory practices
have worked in her state (wellhead protection worked best
when all affected local jurisdictions cooperated). Jim
Marxen, with the California Department of Toxic Substances
Control, says that community assessment provides a valuable
tool in regulatory practice, but only if local communities
are involved early in the process. Romel Pascual,
Assistant Secretary for Environmental Justice at California
EPA, also stressed early involvement of all affected
localities. Linda Giannelli Pratt, program manager of the
Community Sustainability Program for the City of San Diego,
notes that environmental aims at all levels of government
are basically the same, and hopes that better communication
will make it easier for the different levels to work
together.
* A number of messages continued to focus on effective ways
to involve the public, rather than on interagency dynamics.
New Hampshire, for example, has an intern working on
environmental justice for 12 weeks, and he wrote requesting
suggestions for inexpensive, short-term projects. As in
yesterday's discussion, EPA was asked how it will reach
members of the public who need a longer period of education
to understand regulatory issues.
* Fred Stoss provides the URL of a database of subnational
federal agencies, state and Tribal environmental agencies,
and municipal health sites, compiled by the National
Council for Science and the Environment.
STATES BEST PRACTICE
* Co-regulation can be difficult. States are often at a
disadvantage, in that permitting processes don't let states
consider issues that are important to the public. A co-
regulatory opportunity was lost when lead standards were
revised: state lead agencies were excluded from early
planning for the new regulations.
* Nevertheless successes were reported. Eileen Ringnalda
responded to Hamel by offering communication techniques she
has learned working in road design. In state hearings on
new power plants in Illinois, the public is allowed to ask
questions about many other issues as well, since the
hearing is usually their only chance to talk to state
officials. California EPA has been successful in bringing
USEPA and local air quality management people together for
training. Bill Crews describes the National Environmental
Performance Partnership System in the EPA Office of
Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations.
TRIBAL GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICE
* Postings about apparent "special treatment" for Tribes
prompted another reminder that Tribes are in fact sovereign
nations and as such are not treated simply like segments of
the larger US population. As in an earlier discussion, it
was pointed out that Tribes are not identical; there is no
one practice appropriate to all Tribes.
* Postings in this area were primarily positive. EPA's
General Assistance Program works to develop Tribal
environmental protection programs. The result is a group
of Tribal environmental specialists, who can aid in
communication. California gives "Harmony Workshops" to
teach appropriate communications to non-Tribal people who
will be working with Tribes. Dean Suagee offers specific
advice on what statutes to use in protecting Tribal sites.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT BEST PRACTICE
* Panelist Linda Giannelli Pratt summarizes a draft
federalism executive order prepared by her Local Government
Advisory Council, which states that "Issues not national in
scope or significance are most appropriately addressed by
the level of government closest to the people." This draft
order calls for accountability and coordination, and-again
echoing a theme heard throughout the Dialogue-calls for
early and frequent consultation with local governments.
* Panelist Hamilton Brown points out that EPA must reach
out to local governments when new rules will affect local
finances. Panelist Mary Hamel notes that Wisconsin gives
out environmental loans, and conducts workshops to teach
local governments how to apply for them. She suggests that
EPA identify national groups representing different levels
of local government, to offer information but also to get
feedback on how best to approach local governments.
DELEGATED PROGRAMS
* EPA has a tendency to separate state and Tribal delegated
programs, and the suggestion was made to bring the programs
together when they concern areas where states and Tribes
are both impacted.
Each day's summary is intended to capture the essence of
the conversation. While this summary contains the
highlights of participants' comments relating to today's
topic, more comprehensive information may be found in the
individual postings. This and all daily summaries are
available from the agenda page of the website
http://www.info-ren.org/network-democracy/epa-pip/join/agenda.shtml
The dialogue on today's topic is available at
http://www.info-ren.org/network-democracy/epa-pip/archive/date-h1.html
Katherine Carlitz
Reporter
|